Differences between revisions 3 and 5 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 3 as of 2013-10-05 10:26:40
Size: 551
Editor: superuser
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2013-12-02 16:09:22
Size: 555
Editor: rhine
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
EACL does not have a general policy on best paper awards, imposed top-down by the Board. It is essentially the job of the program chairs to decide whether to have best paper awards (and how many), and to implement a policy to determine how to pick a winner. EACL-12 did have an award. A 6-person committee chaired by Stephen Clark (at the request of the program chairs) made the decision, after being presented with a number of worthy papers suggested by the program chairs and members of the program committee.
EACL does not have an official policy on best paper awards, imposed top-down by the Board. It is essentially the job of the program chairs to decide whether to have best paper awards (and how many), and to implement a policy to determine how to pick a winner. EACL-12 did have an award. A 6-person committee chaired by Stephen Clark (at the request of the program chairs) made the decision, after being presented with a number of worthy papers suggested by the program chairs and members of the program committee.

EACL does not have an official policy on best paper awards, imposed top-down by the Board. It is essentially the job of the program chairs to decide whether to have best paper awards (and how many), and to implement a policy to determine how to pick a winner. EACL-12 did have an award. A 6-person committee chaired by Stephen Clark (at the request of the program chairs) made the decision, after being presented with a number of worthy papers suggested by the program chairs and members of the program committee.


Stephen Clark. October, 2013

eacl: Best paper awards (last edited 2013-12-02 16:09:22 by rhine)